Portale Open Data dell'Unione europea - Custom query: Concetti di EuroVoc filters: paese membro; Copertura geografica filters: Belgium, Spain; Parole chiave filters: victimstag:data.europa.eu,2012:/feeds/custom.atom?vocab_concepts_eurovoc=http%3A%2F%2Feurovoc.europa.eu%2F2298&vocab_geographical_coverage=http%3A%2F%2Fpublications.europa.eu%2Fresource%2Fauthority%2Fcountry%2FESP&tags=victims2020-01-20T17:14:00ZEuropean Publications Officehttps://data.europa.eu/euodpRecently created or updated datasets on Portale Open Data dell'Unione europea. Custom query: Concetti di EuroVoc filters: paese membro; Copertura geografica filters: Belgium, Spain; Parole chiave filters: victimsChildren in criminal judicial proceedings - comparative information on legal counsel and representationEuropean Commission, DG Justice and Consumers, C2 Fundamental rightstag:data.europa.eu,2012:/dataset/legal-counsel-and-representationHere you can find comparative information on children in criminal judicial proceedings - comparative information on legal counsel and representation for all the EU28 Member States on the basis of information collected from national and international databases. The data is available on e.g:
- Statutory provision on the right to legal representation at all stages of the proceedings;
- Existence of mandatory defence mechanism;
- Percentage of children who have waived their right to a lawyer;
- Statutory provision on the right of children (offender, victim and witness) to free legal aid;
- Percentage of children questioned by the police in the absence of either a parent/trusted person or lawyer present;
- System in place to assign automatic free legal aid to children, without conditions;
- Children involved in criminal proceedings who received free legal aid in a 12 month period.
2020-01-20T17:14:00Z2016-11-16T09:37:20ZChildren in criminal judicial proceedings - comparative information on avoiding undue delayEuropean Commission, DG Justice and Consumers, C2 Fundamental rightstag:data.europa.eu,2012:/dataset/avoiding-undue-delayHere you can find comparative information on avoiding undue delay for all the EU28 Member States on the basis of information collected from national and international databases. The data is available on e.g:
- Statutory provision for the right of a child to have the matter determined without delay by a competent, independent and impartial authority or judicial body;
- Existence of a maximum timeframe for a matter to get to trial when it involves a child offender or victim;
- Average time elapsed between arrest and moment a child is brought before a judge for the first time;
- Statutory provision for the prioritisation of cases involving children;
- Average duration of criminal trials involving child witnesses per child witness in first instance courts expressed against overall timeframe;
- Average duration of criminal trials involving child offenders per child offender in first instance courts expressed against overall timeframe.2020-01-20T16:44:30Z2016-11-03T13:29:14ZChildren in criminal judicial proceedings - comparative information on multidisciplinary approachEuropean Commission, DG Justice and Consumers, C2 Fundamental rightstag:data.europa.eu,2012:/dataset/multidisciplinary-approachHere you can find comparative information on children in criminal judicial proceedings - comparative information on multidisciplinary approach for all the EU28 Member States on the basis of information collected from national and international databases. The data is available on e.g:
- Legal obligation to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the child and assess his/her legal, psychological, social, emotional, physical and cognitive situation using a multidisciplinary approach;
- Existence of memoranda of understanding between Ministry of Justice and other government departments in order to facilitate inter-agency cooperation for professionals working with or for children from prevention through to alternatives to judicial proceedings, detention and release;
- Children involved in criminal justice proceedings who have undergone an assessment of their legal, psychological, social, emotional, physical and cognitive situation by a social worker, psychologist or other specialised professional from the outset of deprivation of liberty and at the latest upon police questioning;
- Existence of a common assessment framework for professionals working with or for children in criminal proceedings (including lawyers, psychologists, physicians, police, immigration officials, social workers and mediators);
- Percentage of children who were provided with special assistance to effectively participate in the proceedings as a result of the findings of the multidisciplinary assessment;
- Existence of formalised operational cooperation procedures for professionals working with or for children in different government departments and agencies and throughout all stages of the proceedings.
2020-01-20T16:44:16Z2016-11-16T11:51:25ZChildren in criminal judicial proceedings - comparative information on alternatives to judicial proceedingsEuropean Commission, DG Justice and Consumers, C2 Fundamental rights tag:data.europa.eu,2012:/dataset/alternatives-to-judicial-proceedingsHere you can find comparative information on children in criminal judicial proceedings - comparative information on alternatives to judicial proceedings for all the EU28 Member States on the basis of information collected from national and international databases. The data is available on e.g:
- Existence of preset budgets for / public costs of maintaining alternatives to judicial proceedings;
- Offenders who are given the opportunity to elect an alternative to judicial proceedings in a 12 month period;
- Alternatives to judicial proceedings such as mediation, diversion (of judicial mechanisms) and alternative dispute resolution to be prescribed by law whenever these serve the child's best interests;
- Legal obligation to obtain free and voluntary consent to the diversion from the child or consent from parents if the child is below a certain age;
- Existence of structures (e.g. administrative forms) to obtain the free and voluntary written consent to participating in a diversion programme from a child;
- Children charged who entered a pre-sentence diversion scheme;
- Legal obligation to provide the equivalent level of safeguards to children in-court and out-of-court proceedings;
- Statutory provisions for the use and /or prioritisation of alternatives to judicial proceedings for children in conflict with the law.
2020-01-20T16:03:12Z2016-11-16T10:54:19Z